Sunday, 24 July 2016

Ipswich Town – A season preview (part one)

The 2015/16 season was a largely frustrating one for fans of Ipswich Town. Dull football, a poor home record and a spate of late goals conceded meant that, despite finishing in their 2nd best league position since 2005, many left Portman Road craving more. So, as Town enter their 15th season at Championship level, where can they look to improve?

Playing style

This is probably the biggest concern amongst Ipswich fans at the moment. Mick McCarthy’s side, for all of the positives (and it is important to acknowledge the positives, McCarthy has done a largely exceptional job) can be truly terrible to watch at times. To his credit, he has addressed these claims this summer, commenting after the 1-0 win at Colchester:

I think [the Ipswich fans at Colchester] have seen us play some decent football, trying to develop it a bit better, because at the end of last season, it was annoying me a bit – I wasn’t enjoying it”

The stats don’t make for particularly good reading – Ipswich had the second worst pass completion rate in the league in 2015/16 (63.9%), hit more long balls than any other team in the league, and only scored more than two goals on three occasions (all against bottom four sides). This lack of entertaining football is especially grating for Ipswich fans as we’ve seen that this side (and it is a mostly unchanged XI) were capable of some excellent football at times (memories of when we briefly topped the table in December 2014 with great displays v Middlesbrough and at Brentford come to mind).

McCarthy trialled a more expansive style at the start of 2015/16 season – and in fact the performance at Brentford on the opening day was probably as good as it got all year, but his patience was stretched too far after we fell apart defensively in losing 5-1 against a distinctly average Reading side. The feeling is always there that McCarthy is always at pains to dismiss criticism of his tactics, but it has never been as obvious as it was post-Reading that when things aren’t going well, a pragmatic and direct style is the go-to mechanism for the manager.

Right back position

One feature of McCarthy’s Ipswich side is his captain, Luke Chambers. He has played at right back in the vast majority of games in the last few seasons, having replaced Carlos Edwards in that position (as well as taking the armband) in the summer of 2014. He has to be commended for his attitude and willingness in performing at right back since then – he had spent most of his career (and indeed a relatively successful first season with Ipswich) at centre half. Whilst there is plenty to like about Chambers, there is a case to be made for him being a big part of our stylistic problems.
Below is a comparison with successful right backs in the Championship last season (for reference, a score between 10 and 20 is considered average by Squawka

In the 2015/16 season, Luke Chambers gave the ball away more than any other Championship outfield player (he isn’t alone in that regard, our left back Jonas Knudsen was 2nd on that list), losing the ball through passing inaccuracy 325 more times than any other Championship right back. The expected benefit of moving a central defender to full back is that he will add defensive solidity, when in fact this doesn’t appear to be the case. Chambers is the 15th best right back in the league in terms of successful tackles, and 11th in terms of interceptions.

More and more in recent years the full backs have grown into hugely important players in football, their style going a long way to defining a team’s approach in a game. Whilst Knudsen was statistically as bad (if not worse) than Chambers in 2015/16, he receives some benefit of the doubt for being new to the league and showing flashes of capability as a left back. The worry with Chambers is that he looks a long way away from being a regularly effective full back in this division, especially as a lot of the time he is the focal point of our transitional play (42% of our attacks in 2015/16 were down the right-hand side).

The midfield

At current, the most stacked area in our squad is central midfield. We currently have eight in our first team squad (Cole Skuse, Luke Hyam, Jonathan Douglas, Kevin Bru, Giles Coke, Andre Dozzell, Teddy Bishop and Adam McDonnell). The balance of these players isn’t particularly impressive however; of those players only the youngsters Bishop and Dozzell look confident carrying the ball and playing in an attacking role. This lack of drive and flair in the midfield was especially missing last season with Bishop injured, Dozzell untested and the chief creative force in the side, forward David McGoldrick, also unavailable. It seems obvious that at least one of Bishop or Dozzell should start most games, which means we have an abundance of central midfielders for either one or two positions. This surplus of midfield shuttlers seems especially extravagant when we don’t have a winger in the squad who has played a league game for the club.

Whatever formation and personnel we do end up with this season, it is imperative that our central midfielders retain and re-use possession much more effectively. Some of the blame attributed to our wasteful full-backs above has to go the way of our midfield, with their reluctance to take the ball off the back four or goalkeeper.

The feeling during the whole of McCarthy’s reign is that the midfield has been a work in progress, back to the days of Guiraine N’Daw and Hyam giving us much needed stability in his first season when we were battling against relegation, through the introduction of Jonny Williams (and later Bishop) to give us a different outlet. Whilst our side is never going to dominate games with 70% or 80% possession, hopefully an easier-on-the-eye style is possible this season.

In the next part of the blog I’ll be discussing positives, resolutions and potential playing styles and transfers.

Sunday, 24 August 2014

Life after Cresswell - an Ipswich Town tactical review

It’s fair to say that if comparing teams on a player by player basis, Ipswich over performed in keeping up a play-off push until the very last throes of the 2013/14 Championship season. Almost all of the credit has to go to Mick McCarthy and his coaching team for taking a team that were stone last when he took over and adding a defensive resilience and wonderful team spirit that saw them belie financial constraints and expectations in almost having a shot at promotion.

Unfortunately for Ipswich, the above mentioned financial situation means that they are very much a selling club, and when West Ham United came calling to the tune of £4m for star player Aaron Cresswell, many felt that it was a deal that couldn’t be turned down. The worry for Ipswich is that as good (and important for FFP compliance) as the offer was for Cresswell, have they lost the most important player in McCarthy’s team?

Ipswich’s shape

In general, Ipswich play a traditional 4-4-2 formation. McCarthy has at times tried a 4-3-3 or 4-4-1-1, but he always reverts to the tried and tested when the experiments are over. Town lined up with the formation shown in the last game, a home defeat to Norwich City. Note the tucked in wingers, a change from McCarthy’s Wolves side that had true wide men in Michael Kightly and Matt Jarvis when they took the Championship by storm in the 2008/09 season.

The left back role

In terms of personnel, Ipswich had a replacement waiting in the wings for Aaron Cresswell in the shape of Tyrone Mings. He has started all of Town’s league games this season at left full back having signed from Chippenham Town in 2012. Mings was quite a find for Ipswich from non-league – he is tall, strong and very quick and seems to be growing in stature as the games go by. The problem, and it’s certainly not one of his own creation, is that he has been thrown straight into Cresswell’s role, and he isn’t suited to that for a number of reasons.

The pressing of full backs and distribution

The biggest problem with the Ipswich back four at the moment is that they are fairly easy to press. It was plain to see at times at the end of last season that Luke Chambers was picked as the weak link from a distribution point of view (which was to be expected, Chambers has played most of his career at centre back) and teams were performing a form of gegenpressing on him – leaving him free to take the ball as often as possible before closing him down quickly and forcing the error. This wasn’t a massive problem in reality for Ipswich though because they had two competent ball players in Christophe Berra and Tommy Smith in the centre, and Cresswell on the left.

Ipswich's opponents can press the defence easily by ganging up on the
full backs, exploiting their reluctance to play the ball
An underrated quality of the left back was his ability to get out of a hole, be it through his long balls or ability to play a sharp give and go with a midfield player. Mings, unfortunately, is not in the same league as Cresswell in that respect and it leaves the opposition a very easy job of closing down any moves from the Ipswich back four. This limits the distribution options massively, especially as both full backs are very one footed. This was made to look much worse in the first half against Fulham as Town started with the hugely immobile Balint Bajner in attack, and so Mings had nobody willing to run the channels as Murphy was operating on the opposite side. The introduction of McGoldrick at half time allowed Daryl Murphy to be more mobile and offer Mings a consistent out ball (with Murphy’s chasing down a full back in the corner leading to Ipswich’s second goal).

Midfield problems

As well as missing Cresswell as a defensive tool to help clear the lines and relieve pressure, he was arguably also our most effective playmaker. Cresswell was 2nd in the Championship for assists and he was a constant out ball on the left hand side. This led to the rather lopsided formation above; we could afford to tuck our wingers in because we knew we always had a deep and effective runner, at least on one flank. This year we have lost the input from the full backs, and so are even more reliant on the wingers and central midfielders to provide the creative spark. McCarthy seems to prefer a base of functional and conservative central midfielders, so we have to look out wide; however the neither the shape nor the players have changed in pursuit of this goal.


One attribute that a well organised team should always have is the ability to exploit set pieces. Ipswich are certainly capable aerially, with Murphy, Berra, Smith and now Mings all excellent in the air. Of course the problem is that, and you can sense a theme arising here, our chief set-piece taker last year was Cresswell. This is one area of the team that needs addressing desperately if we are to maintain our current gameplan – chances though arrive particularly naturally in open play for teams set out to stifle first and play second, and so corners and goal kicks should be treated like gold dust.

Moving forward

The clearest solution for Ipswich defensively is to slot Jonathan Parr, a summer signing from Crystal Palace, in at left back. He is a much more conservative player than Cresswell - most of his work is done in his own half, but he provides more experience and on the ball ability than Mings. Another new signing, Cameron Stewart, has seen his Ipswich career stalled by a broken jaw, but he could be the answer to the wing conundrum, if McCarthy is willing to replace the tireless running and willingness of Jay Tabb with a player who has proven inconsistent at this level, and certainly won’t offer the same protection and engine in the midfield.

McCarthy is certainly not afraid to change tactically – it’s usually through forced changes but he’s shown a number of different shapes in his time at Ipswich. The warning signs are appearing that the shape that proved successful in 2013/14 may need to be ditched, and hopefully McCarthy can be open to change once again.

Monday, 25 July 2011

The life and times of Neuchâtel Xamax

Russian owner wields axe at Swiss club

Been and gone – Brazilian Sonny Anderson was coach for two games.

 Bulat Chagaev has ambitions of turning Neuchatel Xamax into more than just an impossible to pronounce Swiss club. The Chechen billionaire took over the club in May and wasted no time in making his mark on first team affairs, sacking First Team coach Didier Olle-Nicole on his first day in charge. Not that his replacement fared much better - Bernard Challendes managed to steer Xamax away from a relegation play-off and to the Swiss Cup final, but defeat to FC Sion saw his 3-week tenure come to an end.

It has to be said that these are changing times for the club based on the beautiful Lake Neuchâtel. A relatively new outfit, Xamax were formed in 1970 as an amalgamation of two local clubs and have played in the top level of Switzerland, the Super League for the majority of their existence. They enjoyed a spell at the top of the Swiss game in the mid 80's, qualifying for European competition 5 years in a row, the last two campaigns being in the European Cup having secured their only two league titles in 1987 and 1988. They enjoyed semi-regular UEFA Cup football in the 90's and appeared last in the 03/04 version of the competition, losing out to French club Auxerre in the first round. That was Xamax's last real success of note, they were relegated in 05/06 (they bounced straight back up the next year) and have since bobbed along in the lower reaches of the 10-team Super League.

They were taken over by Chagaev in May of 2011 at the tail end of another mediocre campaign, although not without some controversy. The Russian business man didn't turn up to the vote to confirm his ownership, nor the first press conference, when he was expected at both. He was hardly inconspicuous in his absence. Chagaev was hosting famous footballers from yesteryear in his home country at Terek Grozny (the Chechen club which sacked Ruud Gullit earlier in the summer) in which he owns a stake. Whilst his deal to sign Xamax was being completed, Chagaev was sharing champagne with Diego Maradona, Luis Figo, Robbie Fowler and the leader of the state Ramzan Kadyrov.

The man sent to field questions back in Switzerland was Andrei Rudakov. The ex-Spartak Moscow striker has been put in day-to-day charge of the club under the title of President. His first job was to dilute some of the claims of the Billionaire who had given him the gig. "The first thing is that we have to stay in the Super League," he said. "Today, it's about staying in the Super League and winning the Swiss Cup.” This was in reply to queries from journalists using quotes from the owner who insisted that the club was going to win the Super League at the first time of asking and that he was looking forward to them playing in the Champions League, some doing for a club who finshed 3rd bottom last season.

Not that Xamax have been slow to act in the transfer market. They secured a huge coup in signing former Valencia captain David Navarro to lead their back line, alongside solid Dutchman Sander Keller from FC Utrecht. They also managed to snap-up young stars Victor Sanchez (from Barcelona) and Vincent Bikana, who is a centre half from Cameroon who has been playing with Corinthians in Brazil.
The season looked promising and under Sonny Anderson, the ex-Brazilian international forward, their was a chance that Xamax could challenge in and amongst the European spots. At least that was the idea. The season didn't get off to the best start. The owner had sacked the entire administrative staff before the first game – leaving fans to rely on hand-written tickets to enter the 12,000 seater Stade de la Maladière. What followed was a 3-0 home defeat to Luzern and that saw Chagaev act immediately. Rodrigo Galatto, a Brazillian goalkeeper signed a week previously from Malaga and making his début, was unbelievably sacked by the club.

It seemed that nobody was safe, and that theory was proven correct after Xamax were unsurprisingly defeated at Basel in their second league game of the season. The major shareholder managed to sack his 3rd manager in just 2 months as he terminated the contract of Sonny Anderson and his entire coaching staff. First team coach Francois Ciccolini, who joined Anderson at the club in June, said "They can't ask us to perform magic".

Xamax are currently bottom of the Swiss league and in all honesty it will take a lot for them to challenge for the title this year. They are some way short of the excellent Basel and a turnaround in form that drastic was always going to be unlikely, no matter what the investment this summer. That's not to be said that Xamax isn't a good investment. They are a club with a small but passionate fan base and with patient building could potentially challenge the title-holders in the not so distant future.

It remains to be seen as to whether Neuchatel Xamax and Bulat Chagaev can work as a partnership, but after 2 months and 3 managers, it's hard to see there ever being an environment in which the club can flourish under his rule. It's another example of a European football team being bought under a foreign-owner looking for instant success, and whilst Chageav's wealth isn't the issue in this case, his methods definitely are.

Thursday, 7 July 2011

The rise and fall of Unirea Urziceni

Champions League to obscurity in less than a year

Ex-Chelsea man Petrescu guided Unirea to the Champion's League
Unirea Urziceni started the 2010/11 season in a qualification play-off for the Champions League. The runners-up spot in the Romanian Liga I had secured them a two-legged tie against Zenit of Russia, which they lost by a single goal (1-0 on agg) to end their Champions League ambitions for that year. Fast forward 12 months and Unirea would love to have ambitions of any league at all.

Urziceni is a tiny town in the Ialomita county of Romania. Until 2003 the town's team bobbed along in the lower echelons of the Romanian league system, achieving essentially nothing. Unirea were promoted in the 2002/03 season, entering the split 2nd division of the Romanian football pyramid. It was then that they were taken over by a company called Valahorum, owned by local property magnate Dumitru Bucşaru who made his money cashing in on the collapse of communism by buying up half built Government building projects in the late 80's and turning them into flats.

The newly owned Unirea were quick to reap the rewards, being promoted to the top tier for the first time in their history by winning the play-offs in the 2005/06 season. They didn't start life in Liga I brilliantly, so the manager was replaced a few weeks into the season by Romanian legend and former Chelsea man Dan Petrescu. He managed to consolidate the team (who he had nicknamed 'Chelsea of Ialomita' and who's crest he requested be changed to a near carbon-copy of Chelsea's) to a mid-table finish in his first season at the helm, before a fantastic season in 2007/08 saw them finish 5th and reach the Romanian Cup Final, qualifying for the UEFA Cup in the process (they lost to Hamburg in the 1st round).

It was the next season though that really saw the Unirea story kick into life. Petrescu's men became only the 2nd team (after CFR Cluj) outside of Bucharest to win the title in 10 years, securing the trophy with a 2-1 last day victory over 2nd placed Timisoara. Just three years after reaching the top level, Unirea were the Champions and would be joining Europe's elite in the group stage of the 2009/10 Champions League.

As expected, Unirea were seeded 4th for the group draw and fared relatively well in drawing Rangers, Sevilla and Stuttgart in Group G, although they were heavily tipped to finish bottom and treat it as a learning curve. They instead performed brilliantly. Petrescu's men achieved a real shock in remaining unbeaten at home (including an incredible 1-0 win against Sevilla) and stunned Scottish giants Rangers by turning them over 4-1 at Ibrox. The home record was even more spectacular considering that their 7,000 seater stadium was not fit for UEFA competition and thus they had to play in Bucharest. In the last game of the group stage they travelled to Stuttgart needing just a point to become the first Romanian side to reach the last 16 since 1997. The German side managed to triumph 2-0 on the night, meaning that Unirea had to settle for a still highly respectable 3rd place, and a spot in the newly created Europa League.

It would seem that this is where things started to go wrong for the club. Petrescu left for Russia before they could meet Liverpool in the Europa League and was replaced by Israeli coach Roni Levy. Levy couldn't get through Gerrard and co. but did manage to secure a 2nd position in Liga I and so ensured Champions League football for the next season.

The draw wasn't kind to the Romanian's, and although they managed a goalless draw at home to Zenit, a Danny goal in St Petersburg was enough to see the Russian club through. This is when it started to turn really pear shaped for Urziceni.

The owner, Dumitru Bucşaru, had spent a fair bit of money on the club (signing players and improving facilities) he had in no way financed a Chelsea or Manchester City style mega-spree. After Unirea's elimination from the Champions League, Bucşaru declared that Unirea had reached their peak and that he was no longer interested in the club. He was, however, interested in trying to re-coup his investment by selling practically all of Unirea's assets for bargain basement prices, with Steua Bucharest being the main beneficiaries as they picked up four first team players from the 2nd best team in Romania. Levy left the club in the middle of August as the team around him was falling apart, the sale of goalkeeper Giedrius Arlauskis proving to be the final straw.

The owner continued the cull by tearing up contracts and announcing that the whole of the remaining squad were available on a free transfer. The club managed to cobble together a squad of loaned reserve team players from other clubs and it was no surprise that they were relegated.

Whilst the runners-up of the season before getting relegated is a massive shock, that was not the end of the agony for the club's fans. The owner didn't register Unirea in any Romanian competition at all for the coming season and thus they have ceased to exist. It is an unbelievable turn of events in that in just over 11 months a club can go from sharing a stage with the continent's best to complete extinction but it is a fate that reflects the shocking state of finance in the Romanian game.

The team who finished 2nd in Liga I, Timisoara, will not be taking their place in the Champions League as they have instead been relegated to the 3rd tier due to their financial position. The team known as Poli will be joined by 14th placed Gloria Bistrita who share their financial plight.

It's a similar story to that of Gretna who rise and fall was almost identical to Unirea's in that they were both very small clubs who secured rapid promotions through the leagues, and although Gretna never quite reached the very top, it is fair to say that both clubs were growing well above their means.

The story of Unirea, whilst tragic, could prove to be a stark reminder to some teams on these shores. With more and more football clubs becoming entirely dependent on outside investment from owners, tales such as this become an all too real reminder that football clubs are not invincible.

Thursday, 23 June 2011

The Champions League?

A month on from Wembley, Europe’s premier competition starts again
Bring on the Barca – Luxembourg’s FC Diferdange are only 8 rounds away from the Allianz Arena
Whilst the memories of Messi and co. terrorising Manchester United in the finale of last year’s Champions League final are still vivid in most football fans minds, the fans of the Champions of Europe’s smallest leagues are just days away from kicking off the 2011/12 version of the competition. Exactly one month after the Wembley showpiece, UEFA’s flagship competition will be visiting the slightly less glamorous surroundings of the Stadio Olimpico (Serravalle, not Rome) and the Estadi Comunal (combined capacity of less than 1/10th of Wembley).
The winners of UEFA’s four lowest ranked leagues (the National Championships of Andorra, Luxembourg, Malta and San Marino) are facing off in what is essentially a play-off to join the real qualification rounds of the Champions League. FC Santa Coloma of Andorra will play host to Dudelange of Luxembourg in the competition’s first game before 90 minutes later (presumably not moved for television audiences) San Marino’s champions Tre Fiori take on Maltese capital dwellers Valletta.

I’ll concentrate first on Santa Coloma. The Andorrans are entering their 3rd Champions League campaign having won their 6th league title last season. The club from the picturesque principality on the French/Spanish border are hoping for a better start to this year’s competition, having had the home leg of the 1st Qualifying Round last year forfeited due to the shocking standard of their pitch. Not that they could be held solely responsible – the Estadi Comunal is one of only 2 stadiums in Andorra that between them host the entirety of the two-tier Andorran league system.

They will go into the game as massive underdogs against the comparatively massive Dundelange of Luxembourg. The club, formed in 1991 as an amalgamation of three local teams, took their place in the magnificently named League of Honour, Luxembourg’s 2nd tier in the 91/92 season. They didn’t mess about, getting promoted in their first season, before winning their first title at the turn of the millennium. They’ve since won 9 titles and made history in becoming the first team from the landlocked country to reach the 2nd qualification round of the tournament (before losing 9-3 on aggregate to Rapid Vienna). They’ll be hoping to reach 2.Q this time round as well, and I expect they will. There they will face Slovenian giants Maribor from whom they can expect nothing.

The 2nd of the ties sees a Mediterranean battle between the two small countries of San Marino and Malta. The two countries have performed abysmally (perhaps not surprisingly when considering the tiny stature of the places) on the International stage and I’m afraid to say that their club football hasn’t been much better.
Tre Fiori are one of the most successful sides in San Marinese footballing history, winning the hugely competitive Campionato Sammarinese di Calcio title a record 7 times in their 62 year history. They have only played in the Champions League twice in their history but are San Marino’s best ever entrants – by virtue of having scored 3 goals. Having won the 09/10 league title Tre Fiori took on UE Sant Julia of Andorra and came agonisingly close to becoming San Marino’s first representatives in the 2nd Qualifying Round, but they were defeated on penalties. Unfortunately for them they have got a tough draw in this year’s competition and will find it hard to better their previous attempts of progression.

The team blocking their way are the Manchester United of Malta – Valetta FC. The club based in the capital of the country, who can boast Jordi Cruyff amongst their former players, have won the Maltese Premier League 20 times and have regularly featured in the qualification rounds of European competitions (as Rangers fans may well recall – the Glasgow side having beaten them 18-0 and 10-0 on aggregate in past encounters) without ever making a dent on the biggest stage. They will be looking to take advantage of a kind draw this year though and they have a potentially winnable game against Lithuania’s FK Ekranas in the 2nd Qualification Round.

Whilst next week may not be the most high profile of occasions, this is how a lot of football fans think this competition should be – a competition of just champions. These four sides will have to play six matches in Europe’s outhouses before they can begin to dream about playing the likes of Villarreal, Lyon and Arsenal – neither of whom came close to winning their respective league titles. So whilst the players of small sides like these can look back on careers in which they have played in the same competition as Messi, Ronaldo and Rooney it isn’t unfair to suggest that they will never come close to sharing a pitch with them.

It’s oft-used thinking that there should be no places for teams who come 2nd, 3rd or in some cases 4th in their league to play in this tournament, but in all honesty it is an essential part of making the Champions League what it is. It’s easy to say that we will have a better tournament with just league winners, but the reality is that a team like Santa Coloma – who average lower crowds than most Blue Square Premier teams, are simply not good enough for what is considered the best club tournament in the world.

It is definitely true that the smallest countries are given an unfair crack of the whip though, and it is hard to see them ever improving without a chance of securing both huge investment and a massive boost in reputation. It will be interesting to see if Platini and co. at UEFA will ever look to re-introduce a more evenly balanced tournament, but whilst the Champions League generates the amount of money it does in its current form, it’s hard to see anything but a harder ride for the minnows. That doesn’t mean that these teams can’t dream – Munich’s Allianz Arena is still just 20 matches away!

Saturday, 11 June 2011

Team Dubai

Could the future be bright for Madrid’s third club?

Real Madrid – 31 La Liga titles, 18 Copa Del Rey’s, 9 Champions League’s
Atletico Madrid – 9 La Liga titles, 9 Copa Del Rey’s, Europa League winners in 2010.
Getafe – Errrm?